5/2/2024 0 Comments Repeating crossbowsOf course, their stats reflect that for balance issues, still, most exotic weapons look very difficult to wield (if not impossible.dire flail, anyone?). Bastard swords are exotic because they require extra training to wield them onehanded. Crossbows or spears are simple weapons because they are easy to use. Basically, you could say that Exotic weapons are the ones that aren't common, not the ones that are hard to use (rifles were eminently easy to use, once you'd been shown the basics compared to longbows, it was like 1+1 vs. The Simple/Martial/Exotic system doesn't catch that. Okay, some say it's overpowered, other that it's useless.that helps :smallfrown: Now, should this be a martial or a simple weapon? What do you think overall, any suggestions? 75 yards are 225 feet, so a maximum range of 300 feet is okay (if not a little generous). Note: Infos about clip size and range taken from here (). However, because of the lacking accuracy, the repeating crossbow can not be used with any precision based feats, like Precise shot or Crossbow sniper, and it can not be used to deliver sneak attacks etc. Loading a new clip is a full round action that provokes an attack of opportunity.Ī character that fires a repeating crossbow with a full attack action gains one additional attack, with his highest attack bonus (this stacks with the Rapid shot feat). As long as it holds bolts, you can reload it as a free action by pulling the lever back. Special: A repeating crossbow holds a clip with 10 bolts. I thought about it and came up with that:Ĭrossbow, repeating: Dmg 1d4(S), 1d6(M), 1d8(L), 19-20x2 range increment 30 ft, weight 6 lb However, as suspected, it's weaker and less accurate. Ten bolts in fifteen seconds is like 3-4 attacks per round and they say that was "easy" :smalleek: And if it's extremely easy to use, it shouldn't be an exotic weapon, either - martial, at most, probably even simple. That doesn't sound like a weapon that is "extremely easy to manufacture". The default repeating crossbows cost 250gp (light) and 400gp (heavy), thus, they are the most expensive weapons in the core rules. Since a chu-ko-nu was shot from the hip, the accuracy was poor but could be adjusted very swiftly since the next shot was only a second away. Thus, the chu-ko-nu was not very useful against more heavily armored troops unless poison was smeared on arrows, in which case even a small wound could be fatal. This gave it a shorter range, compensated for by using lightweight arrows instead of the heavy bolts of single-shot crossbows. The chu-ko-nu, however, had neither the power nor the accuracy of a common crossbow, for operational reasons. In comparison, a standard arbalest could barely shoot one in that time. This weapon was extremely easy to manufacture and use, and could easily launch ten bolts in fifteen seconds. The chu-ko-nu was a very simple and rugged design. On Wikipedia (), we find the following description: Repeating crossbows are obviously based on the chinese chu-ko-nu. Not to mention that they suck, too, especially the light one, which has absolutely no benefit over the heavy one. How can a crossbow that's drawn with a quick-pull lever be as strong as one that's drawn with a winch, anyway? However, the versions from the SRD doesn't seem to make much sense. I thought about making the repeating crossbow a more common weapon in my world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |